If you’re an automotive executive fretting over the collapse of the U.S. market, the tidal wave of negative headlines and the steady assault of restrictive new government regulations, stop lamenting. You’ve only got yourself to blame, declared John Krafcik, acting CEO of Hyundai Motor America, during his keynote speech at the 2009 Chicago Auto Show.
“There is no other industrial sector with a bigger perception problem,” Krafcik contended.
It’s not unusual for industry executives to use the spotlight of an auto show to identify the industry’s problems and then call for tepid solutions. But Krafcik’s blunt speech was unusually tough on industry leaders, who must take significant steps to reverse both the automotive downturn – and the decline in the industry’s reputation – he argued.
Asserting that “the decade of greed didn’t end in the ‘80s,” the former Ford product executive said American consumers have come to view automotive executives as “dimwits,” who are “unresponsive to consumer needs,” despite the “lavish perks and unnecessary entitlements” they take home.
The only way to reverse such perceptions – and to revitalize the industry – Krafcik suggested, industry leaders must take significant, and sometimes painful steps. Among them, a pay cap that sets the cash top executives make at a “reasonable multiple” of what the typical automotive worker takes home.
“There’s a large dose of truth,” in the frequent criticism of the industry, said the Hyundai executive, adding that it wouldn’t hurt to be more candid; he cited President Obama, who went on network television to admit he “screwed up” with the abortive appointment of Tom Daschle to his cabinet.
Some of Krafcik’s suggestions weren’t new. He said great new product is essential to getting consumers back into showrooms. But the Hyundai CEO said that several things need to be moved much higher on the industry’s agenda.
For one thing, it’s time to stop resisting calls for improved safety, higher quality and better mileage. Hyundai, he noted, has promised to average 35 mpg, across its fleet, by 2015, five years ahead of new government rules. Meanwhile, Krafcik commended Volvo’s consistent focus on safety, and its goal of eliminating in-vehicle fatalities by 2020. The industry, as a whole, said Krafcik, should adopt that mandate.
“We could engender good will by making this, together, an industry-wide goal,” the executive said.
How to take these controversial steps will be a challenge, he conceded, though Krafcik argued that there are various industry organizations that could lead such efforts. Would his counterparts at Toyota, General Motors, Ford or Mercedes-Benz be willing to take big pay cuts? Krafcik acknowledged it will be a tough – if necessary – sell. But he hinted that he’s already complying with his proposed guidelines.
“Frugal,” he concluded, “is one of the three words in Hyundai’s mission statement.”
dear mr Karefcik and to the idiocy is that no one in the automobile industry is open to any solutions
I have a patent and a plan that can take the entire automobile industry reestablish millions of buyers with the money to immediately purchase hybrid cars, and not one automobile executive the NAD a the governor of Michigan or the Apollo administration will read and immediate answer to put 1 million people back to work and create 1 million extra car sales by the end of year 2010.
If Hundi and herself could possibly be an exception please call me at 847-466-2221.
Or e-mail the address of someone in your company who is intelligent enough to pass this plan to your desk my e-mail is H.Vendig@Comcast.net
While I certainly respect Hyundai and what they have accomplished here in the US — especially over the last decade — and Mr. Krafcik as well, but his rant, to put it mildly, is just a bit disingenuous. The excesses of executive pay and their use of corporate jets are just a tiny part of what is currently causing such distress in Detroit.
Of all of our trading partners who are taking advantage of our totally open and free market, Hyundai above all (with Kia) has benefited the most.
How you say? One part of the Detroit Three’s current woes is due in part to the imbalance of exports vs. imports. South Korean manuafacturers currently sell more than 600,000 units here in the US. The Detroit Three? Less than 7,000 units in South Korea. Tell me how this situation, where the average US-built car after all taxes and duties are added on, costs more in South Korea than a Genesis does in Los Angeles? Is fair to our domestic manufacturers? How can they sell competitive products in South Korea, or do you believe all products produced by the Detroit Three are uncompetitive? I don’t think so; the global playing field must be level. (I am in no way calling for protectionism; just the opposite in fact where the markets of our trading partners are just as open as ours are.)
The Detroit Three, along with our dim-witted Congress, has contributed mightily to the current problems experienced by the domestic manufacturers as this imbalance has been a major contributing factor. It is due in part from our insatiable lust for cheap consumer goods; everything from flat panel TV, to below-market-priced luxury cars.
The problem is complex and the solutions start with fairness, not recrininations.
Richard Truesdell
Editorial Director, Automotive Traveler